Subtle difference since if that were in a loop xyzzy could change each iteration
But in lang like Xojo, C++ where its defined as CONST it is set at compile time
period
once
I had to do some research to figure out that date and that’s what I got from Wikipedia. Either I Googled wrong or what I found was wrong.
Point still stands, using “Var” doesn’t make it a modern languages, especially not when an actual modern language uses instructions first introduced in the 1960s…
Which is exactly why I haven’t renewed. Stop with the “I know better than you” attitude and start listening to what people actually want and maybe they’ll pay you for what they want and not what you think people want.
You are right on the same place and in the same world. Okay I am not the most comprehensive fan of viscose I love GOLang Platform of Jetbrains more for GO but what we are speaking about? Ahh ya. A question of taste but not of functionality. When speaking about Xojo IDE it is unbelievable to get to the point.
Ironically, I asked for this feature so Xojo could make db access easier for peeps coming from FileMaker.
My expectations were a new DB Controller like the old Control Binding where the record set would have controls registered to it and then automatically, via the record set, set, save, etc and trigger new events for detailed handing.
Instead it sat on the Road Map for a long ass time and then not implmeneted anywhere near what Geoff and I discussed. It’s like this was just thrown at the wall to just tick it off the Road Map.
I doubt that the MVPs got a chance to review the plan or the code before Geoff released it…