Sad enough, but true.
As long as russia bombs all of ukraine down they may need new stuff every now and then. But to say they do it from our money … dangerous form of thinking. Within this war Putin tries to dismount the state of USA as the leading nation and to push it to china as leading nation. If this will be happened there is no problem with trump as president anymore. While this would lead to a world we all don’t want to have.
Let’s see what happens.
Personally I am OK with a multi polar world instead of the current uni polar one where one nation (US) calls all the shots.
That would be okay if it would not be so that the multipolar world would be leaded by dictators. Exactly that is one of this problems. But hey, we should have a look how much democrathy America has with the next President Donald Trump. What he wants sounds like he wants to be a dictator which will never need an election again. Let’s see.
A false analogy occurs when two things are compared in a way that seems reasonable at first but ignores critical differences, making the comparison invalid. In the case of comparing civilian casualties in the Palestinian region to those in Ukraine, the analogy breaks down because the conflicts are fundamentally different in their causes, contexts, and global implications. The war in Ukraine involves one sovereign nation (Russia) invading another (Ukraine), a violation of international law that has sparked a broad, coordinated global response due to its potential to destabilize the region and the world. In contrast, the conflict in the Palestinian region is rooted in decades of territorial disputes and historical grievances between Israel and Palestine, with responses shaped by complex geopolitical, religious, and historical factors. Comparing these two conflicts ignores these crucial distinctions, much like comparing a car to a bicycle simply because both are vehicles; the similarities are superficial, and the differences are fundamental.
International laws are broken in Palestinian region too. It’s a sad fact that civilian casualties can’t be avoided when at war.
To put things into perspective, during World War II, the bombing of Hamburg during Operation Gomorrah alone killed more than twice the amount of civilians have been killed in Ukraine so far.
This is not comparable at all. I don’t know why you think that russia is right of even if but that sounds so. Small hint: No, russia is not.
Perspective? Look at your answer to me about Teboill and world war II. Where is your perspective and loyalty coming from? Is it possibly to the east of Finland?
I did not say that Russia is right, I said civilian casualties are not uncommonly large in Ukraine. Do you expect that in war comes no civilian casualties?
You accept civilian mass murders of WWII or inside Palestinian region and judge only what is happening in Ukraine? I think all killing is wrong!
Once again, you write a response where you imply that I have said or think something I have never addressed, and shift the focus away from what my comments were actually about.
Your logic is that all Finnish should hate Russian because of Winter War? We fought against Ukrainians too. I don’t support any war but there are double standards.
Finnland faught against Sowjet Union. Not Ukraine. Not Russia.
Once again, you are drawing the wrong conclusions from the comments and insinuating, for example, that I hate Russians, which I have never claimed. If you instead focus on the lessons learned from World War II, you might see my comments in a different light in the time we live in now.