This is what they get when they donāt prioritize bug fixes, donāt have enough manpower, donāt really plan features, donāt implement unit tests, and donāt do code reviews. These are not new problems. I should go back into the way back machine to see when I first blogged about REALbasic bugs piling up. Iād have to imagine it was 2006 or so.
I havenāt entered a bug report in 3 or 4 years and Iāve had a dozen or so closed in the last couple of weeks. Sad, but predictable.
In their situation: what else they should do? They canāt fix this bugs at all. So archiving or deleting. No other chances. And many of the bugs are really annying even today. That is what I canāt understand. Renaming the framework instead fixing itās bugs. But that is their policy. I guess: made for another than pro users cause nobody can exist under this amount of bugs.
But this has to be changed from them by self. Nobody from outside can do anything. They have their Idea and they do it like they want it. It will run for the next years and one day it goes to the end. People relying on it will have a problem from that day on. At least if the license-Servers stopping to work. Cause then it is a bit of a problem to revoke licenses to another computer and so on. Even with the license file it can be a problem. SHOULD work but is not always.
Well, this was the topic of another thread here many years ago: Open Source at least the compiler and continue selling the IDE, the hosting, support and consulting services. Moderate community-driven decisions.
But they missed this window of opportunity when they could catch their leaving Pro Users. Now itās too late. At least for me.
P.S: I shouldnāt write ātheyā I better should use āheā, our genius.
TBH I would suggest they open source the IDE and sell the compiler
BUT, the compiler isnt completely stand alone
Hence why there is no command line compiler
The IDE & compiler are intertwined in a way that you need both pieces